|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |

Rexthor Hammerfists
Rage of Inferno Minor Threat.
|
Posted - 2009.09.19 15:00:00 -
[1]
Slave sets are a huge bonus for armor tanking supercaps, shieldtanks are left out here.
Im also not quite sure what a mothership is supposed to do with 3 ganglinks unless a change to links on moms would allow them to benefit capital remote reps and/or/only capital local reps. -
|

Rexthor Hammerfists
Rage of Inferno Minor Threat.
|
Posted - 2009.09.19 21:41:00 -
[2]
I disagree with supercarriers being able to dock, it makes em just another ship and takes the novelty away of seeing, flying and killing them. -
|

Rexthor Hammerfists
Rage of Inferno Minor Threat.
|
Posted - 2009.09.22 01:27:00 -
[3]
How about seperating supercarriers from carriers with a more powerful bonus then simple dps and costing 13b to make while not able to dock -
It already is a sortof flagship with its commandmods, if the fleet bonuses of the titan get moved to motherships theyd had a significant role besides doing the dps of two dreads. Titans will be happy with their bridges, instaing capitals and doing twice the damage of a sieged dread with only their xl guns - theyd never fit a warfare mod inplace of a xl turret while supercarriers have 5 highslots to play with. -
|

Rexthor Hammerfists
Rage of Inferno Minor Threat.
|
Posted - 2009.09.24 16:13:00 -
[4]
Currently the commandships get a 3% role increase for their specific mods, strategic cruisers 5%
Motherships coul get a bonus of 5% or somethin around that, carriers maybe 3% to underline their bonuses and making it worthwwhile fitting these mods on carriers. -
|

Rexthor Hammerfists
Rage of Inferno Zenith Affinity
|
Posted - 2009.10.14 20:05:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Rexthor Hammerfists on 14/10/2009 20:05:34 Doh, the ganlink is gone for supercarriers? How come? -
|

Rexthor Hammerfists
Rage of Inferno Zenith Affinity
|
Posted - 2009.10.29 16:39:00 -
[6]
That would be the boring solution.. -
|

Rexthor Hammerfists
Rage of Inferno Zenith Affinity
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 23:00:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Rexthor Hammerfists on 12/11/2009 23:00:48 This is beyond words - why would i now lock up a character ina wyvern when it does nothin better then a chiemra and a phoenix - hell i could make sue of that characters recon5 and hac 5 and commandship5 at the same time. Im no even sure what persuaded you to make this move it just doesnt make sense?
And woohoo maxed out mindlinked Siege Warfare Harmonizing mod.. -
|

Rexthor Hammerfists
Rage of Inferno Zenith Affinity
|
Posted - 2009.11.13 12:53:00 -
[8]
What i have to wonder is why Nozh actually comes up with this thing. I mean forgetting for a sec how its done etc. - the preNozh SC change has been hailed by pretty much everyone in this thread. There were discussions about minor balance details but no one questioned the whole deal that has been on sisi for months, it was completely accepted.
Where does Nozhs idea come from? It is a completely new one which, i guess, is to lower the step from capital to supercapitals but i atleast never saw a reason for it to be lowered. PPL alrdy are cautious with their carriers and dreads, few but them into harms way lightly - a supercarrier costing 4.5b instead of 9 isnt going to change the pilots mind in which hed be very careful about the decision to bring his ship into combat.
On the other side this change can cause the supercarrier to lose its status as a unique, awesome ship that takes great costs and dedication to acquire - and turns it into a more mainstream ship.
9b in Minerals is alot for many, but achievable - its a dream within reach, if one really wants. Titans one the other hand are way out there. If supercarriers have lost their uniqueness, what is a common players goal then? -
|

Rexthor Hammerfists
Rage of Inferno Zenith Affinity
|
Posted - 2009.11.23 12:47:00 -
[9]
Problem with a rep bonus would be that aside from hge battles, smaller fleets will have hard times of breaking a supercarriers tank. With the current hp changes it will take a sizeable group quite some time to kill a SC but it can do it, which seems only fair to me.
Usually SC are fielded with escorting carriers which also will be able to rep it rather quickly, so it souldnt be much of a concern, imo it makes them rather more interesting. -
|

Rexthor Hammerfists
Rage of Inferno Zenith Affinity
|
Posted - 2009.11.27 22:19:00 -
[10]
You should also add that if one side depends on the supercarrier dps the other fc has plenty options to neutralize that dps. 3-4 bombers would take out a fighterbomber i assume - or a few snipehacs or even bcs could inflict serious damage if prepared with an oversetup and their own target calling. -
|
|

Rexthor Hammerfists
Rage of Inferno
|
Posted - 2009.12.09 10:48:00 -
[11]
Something i would like to see, for all capitals, but motherships would be a good start, is a similar subsystem-system t3 ships have. Part of why t3 ships are so interesting is because they can switch their roles and have several unlike specialized recons as example.
Something similar was actually proposed by tuxford after the first carrier changes didnt go through, t3 subsystems would fit this perfectly. It would eliminite the search for its roles etc as the owner could decide it themselfes mroe or less.
Something like more resistance or more tank, gang mod or no gangmod, maybe even a hictor point vs 100km normal point, remote rep bonus or more drones - theres plenty things that can be done. It would prolly be wise to test this for quite some time on the testserver to make sure theres alternatives and notone unbalanced cookiecutter fit, but im sure every mothership pilot would love it as it makes it alot more interesting. -
|

Rexthor Hammerfists
Rage of Inferno
|
Posted - 2009.12.17 12:57:00 -
[12]
Having a mom sittin a pos id rather they work ont he lag and dominion problems that make playing with my other 3 accounts not that fun either.
Of course i wouldnt mind if someone in ccp hq would steal abarthurs floppy disk with his proposed supercarrier changes and slipss those onto tranq ;) -
|
|
|
|